Archival Footage in Documentaries: How to Legally Use Old Videos Without Getting Sued

Joel Chanca - 14 Dec, 2025

You’re editing your documentary. You found the perfect clip-a 1968 protest march, grainy but powerful. It’s exactly what your story needs. But when you try to use it, someone says, "You can’t just take that. It’s copyrighted." Now what?

Archival footage is the backbone of most serious documentaries. It’s how we see history come alive: civil rights marches, moon landings, war footage, forgotten TV ads, home movies from the 1950s. But using it isn’t as simple as downloading and dropping it in. If you don’t know the rules, you could be sued-or worse, have your film pulled from festivals and streaming platforms.

What Counts as Archival Footage?

Archival footage isn’t just old videos. It’s any pre-existing motion picture or video material you didn’t shoot yourself. That includes:

  • Newsreels from the 1940s
  • Home movies uploaded to YouTube by a stranger
  • Corporate training films from the 1970s
  • Television broadcasts, even if they aired decades ago
  • Film clips from Hollywood movies

Just because something is old doesn’t mean it’s free to use. Copyright lasts for decades-even up to 95 years after publication in the U.S. A 1955 news clip? Still protected. A 1920 silent film? Maybe public domain. But you can’t assume. You have to check.

Fair Use: The Legal Loophole Everyone Talks About

Most filmmakers hope they can rely on fair use. It’s the legal doctrine that lets you use copyrighted material without permission under certain conditions. But it’s not a free pass. Courts don’t decide fair use based on your intentions-they look at four specific factors.

  1. Purpose and character of the use - Are you using it for education, commentary, or criticism? Or just to fill screen time? Transformative use matters. If you’re analyzing the clip to show how media shaped public opinion during the Vietnam War, that’s strong fair use. If you’re just playing the clip as background footage while someone talks over it? Weak.
  2. Nature of the copyrighted work - Factual content (news footage, government films) gets more protection than creative works (movies, music videos). But even factual clips can be protected if they were originally produced for commercial distribution.
  3. Amount and substantiality used - How much of the original did you take? Using a 30-second clip from a two-hour news broadcast is better than using the entire two hours. Even a five-second clip can be too much if it’s the most important or recognizable part-the "heart" of the work.
  4. Effect on the market - Will your use replace the original? If someone could watch your documentary instead of buying the original footage, you’re in trouble. If your documentary is about the 1969 moon landing and you use a 12-second NASA clip, that’s fine. But if your whole film is just a compilation of NASA footage with no commentary? That’s a problem.

There’s no magic formula. A judge looks at all four together. Courts have ruled in favor of documentaries like Exit Through the Gift Shop and The Fog of War because they transformed the footage into new meaning. But they’ve also ruled against films that used clips too casually.

When Fair Use Doesn’t Work

Some situations are clear-cut: you can’t claim fair use if:

  • You’re using footage for entertainment value only-no analysis, no critique, no context.
  • You’re using it as a visual prop to make your film look "professional" without adding value.
  • You’re copying the exact same version used in a commercial archive (like a well-known news network’s original broadcast).
  • You’re making money from it and the original rights holder could reasonably expect to license it.

Here’s a real example: A filmmaker used a 10-second clip of a 1980s commercial for a toy robot. The clip was funny, nostalgic, and fit the tone. But the toy company still owned the rights. Even though the clip was short, the court ruled it was used to attract viewers-and that hurt the company’s ability to license it to others. The filmmaker had to pay $15,000 in damages.

Split-screen of vintage film projector and modern documentary edit with legal fair use scale.

Licensing Archival Footage: The Safe Way

If fair use is risky, licensing is the fallback. It’s expensive, but it’s clean. You pay for the right to use the footage, and you get legal protection.

Major archives include:

  • AP Archive - News footage from 1895 to today. Prices start at $500 for a 30-second clip.
  • Getty Images - Stock footage, historical photos, and video. Licensing fees vary by usage (broadcast, streaming, educational).
  • Internet Archive - Free public domain material. You can download and use thousands of clips, but verify the copyright status yourself.
  • Library of Congress - Many government-produced films are public domain. Check their catalog for titles marked "No known copyright restrictions."

Licensing isn’t just about money. You also need to get the right type of license:

  • Non-exclusive - Others can use the same clip. Fine for documentaries.
  • Exclusive - You’re the only one who can use it. Overkill unless you’re making a competing film.
  • Worldwide vs. regional - If you’re only screening in the U.S., don’t pay for global rights.
  • Term - Is it for one year? Forever? Most docs get perpetual rights.

Pro tip: Always ask for a written license agreement. Verbal promises don’t hold up. And never assume a clip is free just because it’s on YouTube or Vimeo. Those platforms don’t own the rights.

Public Domain: The Free Zone

Some footage is completely free to use. In the U.S., works published before 1929 are in the public domain. That includes silent films, early newsreels, and government productions.

But here’s the catch: the film may be public domain, but the copy you found might not be. If a company restored, colorized, or remastered a 1925 film, they might own the rights to that new version. Always trace the source. The Library of Congress and the Internet Archive are your best bets for verified public domain material.

Example: The 1927 film Metropolis entered public domain in the U.S. in 2023. But if you download a 4K remaster from a commercial site, they might still claim rights over their restoration. Stick to the original scans from official archives.

What About Home Movies?

Found a family video from 1962 on a dusty VHS? You think it’s yours-but is it?

Ownership of home movies is murky. If you shot it, you own it. If you found it, you don’t. Even if the person who made it is dead, their heirs might still hold copyright. Unless you have written permission from the estate, don’t use it.

There’s one exception: if the footage was never published and the creator is unknown, it might fall under "orphan works." But U.S. law doesn’t give you legal protection for using orphan works. You’re still at risk.

Best move? Contact the family. Ask for permission. Get it in writing. Even a simple email saying, "I’d like to use this in my documentary, with credit," is enough.

Hand pulling a public domain film canister from an archive shelf in the Library of Congress.

What If You Get a Cease-and-Desist?

Let’s say you used a clip you thought was fair use-and you get a letter from a lawyer. Don’t panic. But don’t ignore it either.

Step one: Stop using the clip. Step two: Consult a lawyer who specializes in media law. Don’t rely on Reddit advice. Step three: If you truly believe it’s fair use, your lawyer can send a counter-notice. But that can lead to a lawsuit.

Most indie filmmakers settle. Why? Legal fees can cost $10,000+. A license for the clip might be $2,000. It’s cheaper to pay than to fight.

Documentaries like The Fog of War and 13th spent tens of thousands on licensing. They knew the cost of legal trouble wasn’t worth it.

Real-World Checklist for Archival Footage

Before you use any old video, ask yourself:

  • Is this footage under copyright? (Check the year and source)
  • Am I using it for commentary, critique, or education? Or just to fill space?
  • How much am I using? Is it the most important part?
  • Could this replace the original? Would someone buy this clip because they saw it in my film?
  • Do I have a written license? Or written permission from the rights holder?
  • If I’m using public domain footage, is it the original version-or a restored copy?
  • Have I documented my fair use reasoning? (Write it down. It helps if you’re challenged.)

If you answer "no" to any of these, don’t use it. Find another clip. Or pay for it.

Bottom Line: Don’t Guess. Document.

Archival footage is powerful. It connects your story to real history. But using it without due diligence is like driving without a seatbelt. You might get away with it-but one crash, and you lose everything.

For every clip you want to use, write down:

  • Where you found it
  • Who owns it
  • Why you think it’s fair use (or how you licensed it)
  • How much you’re using
  • Whether you got permission

Keep that file. If you ever get questioned, you’ll have proof you tried to do the right thing. That’s not just legal protection-it’s professional integrity.

Can I use archival footage from YouTube in my documentary?

No-not unless you have permission from the copyright owner. YouTube users don’t own the rights to most videos they upload. Even if the video is old or has no copyright notice, it’s still protected. Using it without permission puts you at legal risk. Always track down the original source and verify ownership.

Is all government footage free to use?

Most U.S. federal government footage is in the public domain, especially from agencies like NASA, the National Archives, or the Department of Defense. But state and local government footage may still be copyrighted. Always check the source. The Library of Congress and archives.gov are reliable places to find verified public domain material.

How much does it cost to license archival footage?

Costs vary widely. Short clips from news archives like AP or Getty can start at $300-$800 for non-commercial use. Broadcast rights for a 10-second clip might cost $2,000-$5,000. For major historical footage used in a wide-release documentary, fees can go up to $20,000 or more. Always negotiate based on your budget and intended distribution.

What if I can’t find the copyright owner?

That’s called an "orphan work." U.S. law doesn’t give you legal protection to use orphan works, even if you’ve made a good-faith effort to find the owner. The safest route is to avoid using it. Look for alternatives in public domain archives or consider re-creating the scene with new footage.

Can I use music with archival footage without a license?

No. Music is a separate copyright from the video. Even if the footage is public domain, the soundtrack may still be protected. Using a 1950s news clip with its original background music requires a license for the audio. Always clear music rights separately-or replace it with royalty-free music.

Comments(10)

Genevieve Johnson

Genevieve Johnson

December 16, 2025 at 09:39

This post is a godsend for indie filmmakers like me. I just spent three weeks getting sued over a 7-second clip of a 1980s cereal commercial. 😅 Turns out, even nostalgia has a price tag. Now I document everything like the author said - source, reason, amount. Saved my film. Thanks for the clarity!

Alan Dillon

Alan Dillon

December 16, 2025 at 18:16

Let’s be real - fair use is a myth crafted by lawyers to keep indie creators in perpetual anxiety. The four factors? They’re not rules, they’re guidelines that change depending on who’s sitting on the bench. I once used a 12-second clip of a NASA moon landing in a film about climate denialism. The court said it was transformative. The next year, someone used the same clip in a TikTok meme and got hit for $50k. There’s no consistency, only luck. And if you’re not rich enough to fight, you don’t get fair use - you get a settlement letter. The system is rigged. Don’t trust any ‘safe’ advice. Only licensing is real protection, and even that’s a gamble if the rights holder is a corporate ghost.

Derek Kim

Derek Kim

December 17, 2025 at 14:48

Y’know what’s wild? People think YouTube = public domain. Bro, that’s like thinking your neighbor’s garage is yours because the door was unlocked. I found a 1952 home movie of a kid riding a tricycle in front of a nuclear test site. Uploaded by some guy named ‘BobFromOhio1987’. I thought, ‘free content!’ Then I traced it to a private collector who’d digitized it in 2003. He owned the damn thing. Paid him $800. Worth it. Don’t be that guy who thinks ‘it’s on the internet’ means ‘it’s yours.’

Reece Dvorak

Reece Dvorak

December 18, 2025 at 01:55

For anyone new to this: start with the Library of Congress and Internet Archive. They’ve got thousands of legit public domain clips - no fees, no stress. I used a 1943 War Department film about rationing in my doc on food inequality. Clean, legal, powerful. And yes, always write down your reasoning. Even if you think it’s obvious. Future-you will thank present-you when the lawyer emails. You’re not just protecting your film - you’re building integrity. Slow down. Document. Breathe.

Sushree Ghosh

Sushree Ghosh

December 18, 2025 at 10:32

Let’s not pretend copyright law is about creativity. It’s about control. The system was designed to protect corporations, not artists. You think a 1925 film is public domain? Maybe. But if someone restored it, they own the restoration. That’s not justice - that’s legal extortion. The real question isn’t ‘can I use it?’ It’s ‘who profits from my use?’ And the answer is always: not you. The system is designed to make you pay, to make you beg, to make you surrender. The only real freedom is in creating your own footage. Everything else is borrowing from a cage.

Julie Nguyen

Julie Nguyen

December 18, 2025 at 11:41

Why are we even having this conversation? If you’re using footage without paying, you’re stealing. Full stop. The government doesn’t give you free access to someone else’s property just because it’s old. You wouldn’t walk into a museum and take a painting because it’s ‘historical.’ Why do you think video is different? If you can’t afford licensing, don’t make a documentary. Go make a YouTube vlog with your cat. Stop pretending you’re an artist when you’re just a thief with a timeline.

Kate Polley

Kate Polley

December 20, 2025 at 06:50

YOU GOT THIS 💪 I know it feels overwhelming, but you’re already ahead just by asking these questions! Seriously - if you’re reading this and thinking ‘I don’t know where to start,’ just pick ONE clip. Look it up on archive.org. If it’s marked ‘no known copyright restrictions,’ you’re golden. Then write down why you’re using it. That’s it. You don’t need to be perfect, just intentional. I’ve seen so many filmmakers freeze because they’re scared. You’re not alone. We’re rooting for you. 🌟

Matthew Diaz

Matthew Diaz

December 21, 2025 at 17:22

Okay but what about the music?? Like I used this 1963 news clip with the original jazz in the background - totally iconic right? Then my editor says ‘you gotta clear that too’ and I’m like ‘wait what??’ So now I’m stuck paying for a 15-second sax solo that’s probably from some dead guy’s nephew’s estate. The whole thing is a scam. I’m just trying to tell a story and now I’m in a legal maze with a $2000 invoice for a 3-second trumpet note. 😭

Curtis Steger

Curtis Steger

December 22, 2025 at 19:05

They don’t want you to know this but the whole copyright system is a front for globalist elites to control history. The government didn’t make those films for you - they made them to brainwash you. The ‘public domain’ is a lie. The Library of Congress? Controlled by the same cabal that owns the media. The Internet Archive? A front. They let you use old footage so you think you’re free - but you’re still in the matrix. The only real solution? Burn the hard drives. Destroy the archives. Start from scratch. No one owns history. History belongs to the people - until they put a copyright on it. Wake up.

Pam Geistweidt

Pam Geistweidt

December 23, 2025 at 03:25

im just trying to make a doc about my grandpa’s WWII letters and i found this 1944 army training film on youtube with his voice in the background maybe? i think? its fuzzy and i cant even tell if its him but i really want to use it because its emotional and feels right but now i dont know if i should or if i’ll get sued and my mom says dont risk it but i feel like its his story and he’s dead and no one else cares about it so why does it matter if i use it i just want to honor him

Write a comment